** apologies for multiple postings **
Dear All:
On behalf of the McConnell Brain Imaging Center's faculty, staff and trainees, I am glad to invite you to celebrate our 30th anniversary on February 11, 2015 at the Montreal Neurological Institute.
We have prepared an exciting scientific and social program, featuring keynotes from Prof. Robert Zatorre (MNI), Prof. David Van Essen (Principal Investigator, The NIH Human Connectome Project) and Prof. Henry Markram (Director, The Blue Brain Project and Coordinator, The EU Human Brain Project).
Registration is free but mandatory, as space is limited.
Detailed program and registration: http://mcgill.ca/bic/bic30
I am truly looking forward to celebrating this important event with everyone of you.
Cheers!
Sylvain.
-----------------------
Sylvain Baillet, PhD
Professor, Neurology, Neurosurgery & Biomedical Engineering
MNI Killam and FRQS Senior Scholar
Interim Director, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University
http://mcgill.ca/bic
[cid:03D522B9-82AF-4618-A227-0C9BC1982736]
This message is a "probe" for your subscription to the coggroup list. You
do not need to take any action to remain subscribed to the list, and in
particular you should not reply to this message. Simply discard it now.
You can find below the instructions for subscribing/unsubscribing to any
listserv list for the Department of Psychology.
http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/computing/listserv.htm
Mehrdad Khosraviani | Systems Manager | Department of Psychology | McGill University |
Stewart Biology Building, 1205 Dr. Penfield, Room W8/6C, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1 | 514.398.1495
Reminders for the upcoming week:
(1) Cognitive Area Seminar
Dirk Schlimm
Title: Analogies in mathematical domains
Abstract: The structure-mapping theory has become the de facto standard account
of analogies in cognitive science and philosophy of science. In this talk I
introduce a distinction between two kinds of domains and I show how
the account of analogies based on structure-preserving mappings fails in
certain (object-rich) domains, which are very common in mathematics,
and how the axiomatic approach to analogies, which is based on a
common linguistic description of the analogs in terms of laws or axioms,
can be used successfully to explicate analogies of this kind. Thus, the two
accounts of analogies should be regarded as complementary, since each
of them is adequate for explicating analogies that are drawn between
different kinds of domains. In addition, I illustrate how the account of
analogies based on axioms has also considerable practical advantages,
for example, for the discovery of new analogies.
(2) After the talk (17:00), we will gather in Thompson House for the
Journal Blitz; join us to tell us about an article you have read
recently, hear about what others have read, and discuss (over beer and
nachos or drinks and snacks of your choice).
- Friday November 28
- 15:30 - 17:00
- S3/4 Stewart Biology Building
(2) Journal Blitz
Join us to tell us about an article you have read recently, hear about what
others have read, and discuss (over beer and nachos or drinks and snacks
of your choice).
- Friday November 28
- 17:00 (after the talk)
- Thomson House
Please forward this message to your students and other interested parties.
Thanks,
Amélie
Please forward this message to your students and other interested parties.
Thanks,
Amélie
--
Amélie Bernard
Graduate Student, MIDC
Department of Psychology
McGill University
http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/labs/midccdem/